In the days leading up to recent elections, Facebook militia activity has become a hub for anti-government militia groups that openly recruit, strategize, and train on the platform. According to data gathered by the Tech Transparency Project (TTP), extremist groups and anti-government militias have continued to thrive on Facebook, utilizing the social media giant to organize and rally support despite policies banning such groups. These movements are marked by public calls to arms, discussions of ballot box surveillance, and mobilization efforts that are publicly visible and accessible to Facebook users.
The Ongoing Presence of Militia Groups on Facebook
Anti-government militias are finding Facebook an effective tool for growth and radicalization. TTP data reveals that Facebook hosts hundreds of militia groups that openly share information about training sessions and coordinate state-level organizing. Facebook’s auto-generation of pages for groups like the American Patriots Three Percent (AP3) has only helped these groups grow, allowing extremists to expand their reach and influence. In one recent instance, an AP3 Arizona chapter page was automatically generated by Facebook, fueling concern over Meta’s moderation practices.
Facebook’s Auto-Generation of Pages for Extremist Groups
Auto-generated pages by Facebook, including ones for groups banned on the platform, allow militias to thrive. According to TTP’s findings, Facebook auto-generated pages for the “AP3 NM Training Range” in New Mexico and a regional Arizona chapter, both of which are banned groups. Facebook’s reasoning for these pages—based on user interest—only raises concerns about the reach of extremist groups. Despite Meta’s claims of enforcement actions and investment in moderation, these auto-generated pages allow extremist groups to remain active and recruit on a mainstream platform.
Coordination, Recruitment, and Public Calls to Action
Militia activity on Facebook often includes coordinating armed “musters,” a term for training sessions or gatherings. For example, one recent post from a Virginia militia invited members to an in-person training session. In Wisconsin, group members discussed placing hidden cameras around ballot boxes to monitor election sites. This type of recruitment and coordination remains highly visible and unimpeded.
Some militias have even rebranded, moving away from the term “militia” to names like “Patriot Group” and “Civilian Guard,” in an effort to bypass Meta’s automated moderation. Facebook remains a critical asset for these movements, with members citing the platform’s tools as essential for growing and connecting networks across the U.S.
Facebook’s Moderation Challenge and Meta’s Response
Meta, Facebook’s parent company, has faced scrutiny for its inability to consistently enforce its policies. The platform stated that it took action against AP3 and other paramilitary movements in 2020 and again in 2023, removing over 900 accounts, groups, and pages associated with these groups. A Meta spokesperson said, “We will continue to remove any groups and accounts that violate our policies.” However, as reported by TTP, extremist groups continue to resurface, sometimes with new names or through pages automatically generated by Facebook itself.
For some users, Facebook’s role in enabling extremist activities raises questions about its commitment to user safety and policy enforcement. Katie Paul, director of the Tech Transparency Project, remarked, “Nearly four years after the January 6 attack, Facebook remains a significant recruiting and organizing tool for militias like AP3.”
The Increasing Threat to Election Integrity
With the approach of future elections, concerns are mounting about the impact of militias on public safety and election integrity. A recent Department of Homeland Security memo warned law enforcement agencies that extremist groups might attempt to target ballot drop boxes. In one public Facebook group, U.S.A. Militia We The People, members discussed the potential for “civil war,” with posts reflecting a readiness to mobilize in response to election outcomes. Other posts highlight the groups’ evolving tactics, including potential partnerships with election deniers to monitor or disrupt election sites.
Meta’s Role in Mitigating Extremism
The continued presence of militias on Facebook militia activity underscores the need for Meta to refine its approach to moderation. Mainstream platforms like Facebook are critical for recruiting and organizing, as noted by Jon Lewis of George Washington University’s Program on Extremism: “When extremist groups are relegated to fringe sites, their reach becomes limited.” The ability for extremist groups to operate on Facebook is particularly concerning given its wide reach and accessibility.
As these networks continue to use Facebook as an organizing tool, the need for a robust response from social media companies becomes clear.
For More latest tech news, follow Gadgetsfocus on Facebook, and TikTok. Also, subscribe to our YouTube channel.